The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK
Name
Journal_of_Applied_Ecology_-_2006_-_SUTHERLAND_-_The_identification_of_100_ecological_questions_of_high_policy_relevance_in.pdf
Description
visibility:open
Size
111.24 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (CRC64NVME)
qdX523B3zzo=
Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Sutherland, William J.
Armstrong-Brown, Susan
Armsworth, Paul R.
Brereton, Tom
Brickland, Jonathan
Campbell, Colin D.
Chamberlain, Daniel E.
Cooke, Andrew I.
Dulvy, Nicholas K.
Dusic, Nicholas R.
Fitton, Martin
Freckleton, Robert P.
Godfray, H. Charles J.
Grout, Nick
Harvey, H. John
Hedley, Colin
Hopkins, John J.
Kift, Neil B.
Kirby, Jeff
Kunin, William E.
Macdonald, David W.
Marker, Brian
Naura, Marc
Neale, Andrew R.
Oliver, Tom
Osborn, Dan
Pullin, Andrew S.
Shardlow, Matthew E. A.
Showler, David A.
Smith, Paul L.
Smithers, Richard J.
Solandt, Jean-Luc
Spencer, Jonathan
Spray, Chris J.
Thomas, Chris D.
Thompson, Jim
Webb, Sarah E.
Yalden, Derek W.
Watkinson, Andrew R.
Date published
August 2006
Abstract
1. Evidence-based policy requires researchers to provide the answers to ecological questions that are of interest to policy makers. To find out what those questions are in the UK, representatives from 28 organizations involved in policy, together with scientists from 10 academic institutions, were asked to generate a list of questions from their organizations. 2. During a 2-day workshop the initial list of 1003 questions generated from consulting at least 654 policy makers and academics was used as a basis for generating a short list of 100 questions of significant policy relevance. Short-listing was decided on the basis of the preferences of the representatives from the policy-led organizations. 3. The areas covered included most major issues of environmental concern in the UK, including agriculture, marine fisheries, climate change, ecosystem function and land management. 4. The most striking outcome was the preference for general questions rather than narrow ones. The reason is that policy is driven by broad issues rather than specific ones. In contrast, scientists are frequently best equipped to answer specific questions. This means that it may be necessary to extract the underpinning specific question before researchers can proceed. 5. Synthesis and applications. Greater communication between policy makers and scientists is required in order to ensure that applied ecologists are dealing with issues in a way that can feed into policy. It is particularly important that applied ecologists emphasize the generic value of their work wherever possible.
Funder
| Funder name | Awards |
Science and Engineering Research Council | GRH 36917 |
Journal title
Journal of Applied Ecology
Volume
43
Issue
4
Publisher
Wiley
eISSN
1365-2664
Official URL
Rights statement
In Copyright