Repository logo
Home
Research Outputs
Collections
Statistics
Shared Repository Homepage
  1. Home
  2. Cultural Heritage Shared Repository Service
  3. National Trust
  4. Article
  5. Future restoration should enhance ecological complexity and emergent properties at multiple scales

Future restoration should enhance ecological complexity and emergent properties at multiple scales

Thumbnail Image
Download
Name

Ecography_-_2021_-_Bullock_-_Future_restoration_should_enhance_ecological_complexity_and_emergent_properties_at_multiple.pdf

Description
visibility:open
Size

1.02 MB

Format

Adobe PDF

Checksum (CRC64NVME)

dTBTqWvPmVQ=

Resource type
Journal article
Creator (person)
Bullock, James M.
ORCIDORCID logo
Fuentes†Montemayor, Elisa
McCarthy, Ben
Park, Kirsty
Hails, Rosie S.
Woodcock, Ben A.
Watts, Kevin
Corstanje, Ron
Harris, Jim
Date published
April 2022
Abstract
Ecological restoration has a paradigm of re-establishing ‘indigenous reference' communities. One resulting concern is that focussing on target communities may not necessarily create systems which function at a high level or are resilient in the face of ongoing global change. Ecological complexity – defined here, based on theory, as the number of components in a system and the number of connections among them – provides a complementary aim, which can be measured directly and has several advantages. Ecological complexity encompasses key ecosystem variables including structural heterogeneity, trophic interactions and functional diversity. Ecological complexity can also be assessed at the landscape scale, with metrics including β diversity, heterogeneity among habitat patches and connectivity. Thus, complexity applies, and can be measured, at multiple scales. Importantly, complexity is linked to system emergent properties, e.g. ecosystem functions and resilience, and there is evidence that both are enhanced by complexity. We suggest that restoration ecology should consider a new paradigm to restore complexity at multiple scales, in particular of individual ecosystems and across landscapes. A complexity approach can make use of certain current restoration methods but also encompass newer concepts such as rewilding. Indeed, a complexity goal might in many cases best be achieved by interventionist restoration methods. Incorporating complexity into restoration policies could be quite straightforward. Related aims such as enhancing ecosystem services and ecological resilience are to the fore in initiatives such as the Sustainable Development Goals and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Implementation in policy and practice will need the development of complexity metrics that can be applied at both local and regional scales. Ultimately, the adoption of an ecological complexity paradigm will be based on an acceptance that the ongoing and unprecedented global environmental change requires new ways of doing restoration that is fit for the future.
Funder
Funder nameAwards
Natural Environment Research Council
NE/V006444/1, NE/V006460/1, NE/V006487/1, NE/V006525/1
Journal title
Ecography
Volume
2022
Issue
4
Article number
ECOG12823
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
0906-7590
eISSN
1600-0587
Official URL
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.05780
Rights statement
In Copyright
Licence
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI
10.1111/ecog.05780
Keywords
ecosystem services
UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration
ecosystem functions
Ecological restoration
resilience
landscape
ecosystem
plant communities
conservation
connectivity
Managed by the British Library and supported by the AHRC

Built with DSpace-CRIS software - Extension maintained and optimized by 4Science

  • Cookie settings
  • End User Agreement
  • About
  • Contact
  • Help
Repository logo COAR Notify