Funding evidence‐based conservation
Name
Conservation_Biology_-_2022_-_Parks_-_Funding_evidence_based_conservation.pdf
Description
visibility:open
Size
333.84 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum (CRC64NVME)
ZwBsQPctnKY=
Resource type
Letter to the editor
Creator (person)
Parks, Danni
Al†Fulaij, Nida
Brook, Clare
Butchart, Stuart H. M.
Collomb, Jean†Gaà«l
Cope, David
Dowell, Simon
Falkingham, Becky
Frick, Winifred F.
Gibbs, Douglas
Gray, Emily E.
Heard, Nicolas
Leventis, Anastasios (Tasso)
Mastro, Kate
Meredith, Helen
Mickleburgh, Simon
Miller, Florence
Muir, Matthew
Nuijten, Rascha J. M.
Ockendon, Nancy
Owen, Nisha R.
Owens, Jacob R.
Rodràguez, Jon Paul
Roy, Sugoto
Tully, Elizabeth
Vié, Jean†Christophe
Date published
December 2022
Abstract
The magnitude of the biodiversity crisis is widely accepted, as is the need for substantive action implementing the most effectiveinterventions in the right locations (IPBES,2019). Funding is akey driver of conservation work: its availability and funder preferences often determine what can be done. As representatives of 25 organizations that support conservation projects, we take seriously our responsibilities to ensure that funding decisions support evidence-based conservation actions.
Journal title
Conservation Biology
Volume
36
Issue
6
Article number
e13991
Publisher
Wiley
ISSN
0888-8892
eISSN
1523-1739
Official URL
Rights statement
In Copyright
Collection